I think you should reconsider the general rules regarding the use of credit. I believe that, since we pay for them, we shouldn’t lose them, and any that remain unused – because for some reason we can’t sit down to write in a given month – should be carried over to our account for the following month, together with those for the month after that, provided the subscription remains active. I think thats a fair option.After all, we pay for the credits you offer as part of the plan, as well as for any extra ones we buy. We don’t get them for free, right?

xd xd 1 day ago

1

💡 Feature Request

Maybe it’s just me, but I see this is an issue that has come up before. I’ll add my voice to it. 🤔 Scrolling and selecting the scroll arrows are really difficult as they are virtually invisible and so small. It is a little better on a large-screen PC. However, on a laptop, having to use the touchpad, it is a real pain and very frustrating to see or click on the scroll arrows or the bar. Making them more visible and bigger would surely be a significant improvement.😉

MLR 20 days ago

7

🗳️ Feedback

I'm not sure if I'm going to resubscribe because I already used all of my credits. I bought the hobby plan because that's what I can afford. I somehow scrounged up enough for a 5$ credit pack and went through that too. Now I have to go almost a full month before I can write again, and it's frustrating.

Tiffany Phelps 7 days ago

1

Mobile app

💡 Feature Request

I would love a feature that helps us tighten the synopsis for marketing/query letters or book proposals. This would be SO helpful as we launch our manuscripts into the world. Great features could include Loglines Short Synopsis (Under 500 words) Medium Synopsis (501-1000 words) Long Synopsis (1001-1200 words) Pitch (2 short paragraphs Backcover Blurbs (under 500 words)

Mia Burke 14 days ago

1

💡 Feature Request

Anthropic recently announced it will be adding statistical watermarks to text generated by models released after August 2, 2026 (and will try to add them retroactively to earlier models) to make the text machine-identifiable as being Claude-written. I know it’s too early yet to know exactly how this will be implemented, but once it is implemented, I’m sure many writers would appreciate being able to remove these watermarks from their text (or at least determine whether they are detectable within a project so the text can be edited). https://support.claude.com/en/articles/16266773-how-claude-marks-ai-generated-content

Anonymous author 14 days ago

1

💡 Feature Request

It is a series type it would nice be able to combine character profiles so four sections it does not list four versions of the character

lameone 10 days ago

1

Web app

💡 Feature Request

I really like what I have but it does not fit here so I want to be able to remove from draft but save in a note to recall later.

Kayla Wienczkowski 23 days ago

1

💡 Feature Request

It gets in my way when I’m highlighting text, and I have never once used it. I would like to option to simply turn it off.

F Rogers 7 days ago

💡 Feature Request

Please consider introducing a minimalist, chat-first interface powered by the Muse model—similar to ChatGPT or Claude—for writers who find the standard Story Bible and multi-panel editor overwhelming. While Muse is exceptionally strong at fiction, many users simply want to paste a plot and co-write or expand multi-part stories conversationally through direct prompts without configuring complex project settings. A streamlined chat mode would capture the large audience of storytellers currently settling for general-purpose LLMs, offering a frictionless creative writing experience while acting as an accessible entry point to Sudowrite’s advanced toolset.

Jobin John K 8 days ago

1

💡 Feature Request

I think creators of the plug ins should get some credits to them when used. I created a plug in and sadly I get charged to use my own plug in. and 10-15 people are currently utilizing my plug in for 9k credit a shot depending on the size? It would go a long way as a thank you for those who spent the time creating them.

Peter Shierloh 28 days ago

4

💡 Feature Request

For large fantasy & sci fi projects, the Story Bible gets busy very quickly - in particular the Worldbuilding section. It would be great to be able to collapse entries based on ‘type’. For example, if I’m working on my world’s Technology, I should be able to collapse all entries for other types like Alien Races or Organizations, so I can view just the relevant entries without the clutter of the others.

Forrest Dunn 9 days ago

💡 Feature Request

There should ABSOLUTELY be a lock feature to lock content in the story bible, scene drafts, and chapter drafts. Character cards, scene cards, worldbuilding cards, outline chapers, etc. Even to select text in the drafts or any textbox to lock that specific bit of writing. I cant even tell you how many times Ive loved a piece of information or detail but had to rewrite something and it rewrites everything…

Jean 24 days ago

1

Web app

💡 Feature Request

There should be a way that the Act title can be listed in the chapter sidebar, instead of just the story bible outline

lameone 10 days ago

1

Web app

💡 Feature Request

Actually the manuscript doesn't automatically update the changes we make in the Story Bible. The Story Bible though is a central part of sudowrite. The way how I develop a story more often than not I start with few people and also few locations. During writing new ideas, personas, locations and so on pop only then up. So to be forced each time when a change in the Story Bible is made to copy ALL the chapters already written, so that the manuscript integrates these changes is a NO GO! Sorry folks, your tool is astonishing and I LOVE to work with it. I just can’t understand that this feature hasn’t been developed from the beginning. So I gently ask you to develop this an integrate this in one of your next updates. Thank you for reading. For any questions feel free to contact me. Cheers

Batriatus Leonicus 19 days ago

💡 Feature Request

It would be nice to be able to keep a word or set of words that the AI does not change when it rewrites your paragraph.

Rachel Shifflet about 1 month ago

1

💡 Feature Request

An added feature now allows for importing into Sudowrite from a Scrivener project. How about the reverse: all a full export from Sudowrite to a Scrivener project?

Terry Bauer about 6 hours ago

Web app

💡 Feature Request

I’ve been using the Feedback feature extensively on full novel chapters, and there are a few changes that would make it significantly more useful to me as a long-form fiction writer: 1. Allow feedback on selected text only. I would love the option to highlight a specific passage or scene and run Feedback only on that selection. Running Feedback on an entire chapter can be expensive in credits, particularly when I only want another look at a few paragraphs or one scene. It would also make the tool much more useful during revision, when I’m addressing specific problem areas rather than evaluating the chapter as a whole. 2. Show the credit cost before running Feedback. Please show an estimated credit cost before the user submits the request. When working with longer chapters, it’s difficult to know how expensive a Feedback run will be until after the credits are spent. A simple “This will use approximately X credits” would make budgeting credits much easier. 3. Believability feedback needs more nuance. This category can be very useful, but it sometimes identifies something as unbelievable without adequately considering the established circumstances, worldbuilding, character abilities, or information already provided in the manuscript. I’d like it to distinguish more carefully between an actual plausibility problem and something unusual that has already been supported by the story. 4. Feedback needs stronger adherence to established canon and breadcrumbs. This is especially important in long-form fiction and series work. Feedback sometimes recommends explaining, changing, or questioning something that has already been deliberately established, foreshadowed, or answered earlier. Ideally, it should recognize existing canon and breadcrumbs before identifying something as a gap. Otherwise, following the recommendation can lead to unnecessary repetition and over-explaining things the reader already knows. 5. The cliché detector needs more nuance around physical and sexual responses. In particular, please stop flagging normal physiological responses during orgasm or intimacy simply because similar language appears elsewhere in fiction. Humans have one nervous system with a finite number of ways it responds to stimulation. Trembling, tightening muscles, changes in breathing, loss of coherent thought, etc. are not automatically clichés. Sometimes they’re simply human physiology. Or, put less formally: Robot, we have one nervous system. It responds in only so many ways. 😂 I’d love for the cliché analysis to distinguish between genuinely tired figurative language and unavoidable descriptions of normal human physical responses. Overall, I find Feedback valuable, which is why I use it enough to notice these issues. Giving writers more control over what gets analyzed, greater transparency about credit use, and better awareness of manuscript context would make it much more powerful for novel-length work.

STP_too about 7 hours ago

Web app

+1

💡 Feature Request

Sometimes the editing tools like Rewrite, Draft, Guided Write, etc., produce a close-enough generation, but one that still misses a few things. To correct it, you either accept and edit or start another action, or reject and regenerate. I think it would be useful to be able to comment on the suggestion/edit/generation and ask the model to correct or adjust its generation - similar to commenting, but to the “Session” that still has the context of what we were doing.

omer keidar about 9 hours ago

💡 Feature Request